it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

what do you think my name is

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

i dont understand magnetisation

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

have you read

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

much more tactility

so an active mazelike process

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

its good short few pages

division of reality is straying away from it

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

no i haven't really read anything

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

ion

propensity within someone

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

like first name

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i really havent

you cannot feed someone truth

its good