i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

so an active mazelike process

so at the end

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

have you read

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

its good short few pages

plato

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

bro i read nothing in my life

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

what do you mean

currently

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

whats your name?

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

Better Lift

we can only engage in such a way

i dont understand magnetisation

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

much more tactility

isaac

ion

sorry i am texting like a slav

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

December 2025