think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

lol yea

no i haven't really read anything

division of reality is straying away from it

yeah

i understand

abrar?

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

not their contents

like first name

god being the centre magnet

we can only engage in such a way

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

you cannot feed someone truth

magnetisation/form

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

no like which do people call me

bro i read nothing in my life

so the method has to be autonomous

propensity within someone

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

so at the end

and the fake qualifier

isaac

13, H, grate

The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.