nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
so an active mazelike process
thank you
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
lol yea
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
so at the end
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
lol
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
not their contents
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
propensity within someone
all that is to say
or never left
what do you think my name is
magnetisation/form
its good short few pages
its performative
was it worth it
isaac
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
like magnets
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
so the method has to be autonomous
much more tactility
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
which magnetises chains of pins
plato
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!