propensity within someone

so at the end

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

idk

as in

yeah

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

so an active mazelike process

division of reality is straying away from it

you cannot feed someone truth

you have a beautiful account btw

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

but i respect your search

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

i see a website

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

not their contents

magnetisation/form

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

Thank you, Jack