its good

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

all that is to say

is everyoneback on tumblr now

we can only engage in such a way

bro i read nothing in my life

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

much more tactility

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

have you read

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

the site i am dreaming

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i really havent

autonomy of learning

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

isaac

like first name

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

no longer writing in the third person

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

hello reader,