mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
plato
isaac newton
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
barren land
is this you as well
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
feel you
i was tempted to lie about my name
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
autonomy of learning
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
magnetises a pin
so the method has to be autonomous
so at the end
god being the centre magnet
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
thank you
much more tactility
what do you think my name is
i love it here
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like magnets
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
whats your name?
so an active mazelike process
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
propensity within someone