mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
isaac
have you read
no i haven't really read anything
sorry i am texting like a slav
what do you think my name is
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
plato
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i dont understand magnetisation