ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

you cannot feed someone truth

not their contents

fw

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so at the end

magnetisation/form

Lift Analysis

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

2 (actually index). two is company

much more tactility

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

and the fake qualifier

It Will Get Lighter

Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:49:08

so an active mazelike process

idk

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then