and the fake qualifier
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
not so on: yvf(wthw)
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
so an active mazelike process
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
its good
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
sorry i am texting like a slav
idk
isaac newton
god being the centre magnet
i love it here
have you read
whats your name?
yeah
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
no i haven't really read anything
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
bro i read nothing in my life
was it worth it
bro i read nothing in my life
lol
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
its performative
we can only engage in such a way
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
wait what is that