i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media,
both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant
articulate
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a
breakdown of common interpretations:
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some
insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
bro i read nothing in my life
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent
real but its very manifestation
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry
class
-
Lift and confinement – The crowded, immovable lift represents feeling
trapped or constrained in real life, either by social expectations,
relationships, or internal emotions. The inability to speak in front of
others suggests suppressed feelings or fear of judgment.
-
Unexpected confession – The girl saying “I think I might love you” could
symbolize longing for connection or recognition. It may reflect
unacknowledged desires, vulnerability, or anxiety about intimacy.
-
Forest and snow – The transition to a snowy forest signals escape into the
subconscious, a place of solitude, reflection, and emotional processing.
Snow often represents purity, stillness, or emotional coldness, while dusk
points to transition or uncertainty.
-
The fox – Foxes are traditionally symbols of cunning, intuition, and
guidance, but here it’s more ethereal: its bites are gentle yet noticeable,
suggesting a confrontation with subtle truths, small regrets, or lessons
that must be acknowledged. The unspoken apology indicates things left
unresolved or feelings that cannot be expressed.
-
Death or dissolution – Dying in the dream often doesn’t mean literal death;
it represents transformation, the end of a phase, or surrendering control.
It can indicate letting go of fear, old habits, or emotional blockages.
like people can read 100 books and still not have the
fire within them
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like
text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru
shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by
(oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always
interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read
texts.
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry
class
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream
education now
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
so the method has to be autonomous