i really havent

Slug

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

plato

its performative

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

whats your name?

not their contents

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

magnetises a pin

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

which magnetises chains of pins

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

so an active mazelike process

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

Today I felt like starting

was it worth it

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

we can only engage in such a way

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

IWGD

i love it here

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

its good short few pages

so the method has to be autonomous

division of reality is straying away from it

idk