i dont understand magnetisation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
not their contents
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue
i am quite illiterate on producing technology
but i respect your search
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
autonomy of learning
its good
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
plato
have you read
feel you
division of reality is straying away from it
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
send link
that looks like my instagram account
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
ion
no like which do people call me
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
and the fake qualifier
really i want the internet