i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i dont understand magnetisation

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

isaac newton

ion

fw

idk

isaac

or never left

its good

which magnetises chains of pins

thank you

no like which do people call me

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

so at the end

autonomy of learning

its good short few pages

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i have read not even 1 book

feel you

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

what do you mean

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i understand

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i want to do that too

so the method has to be autonomous

we can only engage in such a way

yeah

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

plato

all that is to say

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

"Put a blanket."

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.