Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?
its good
bro i read nothing in my life
and the fake qualifier
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
is this you as well
no i haven't really read anything
barren land
much more tactility
i dont understand magnetisation
all that is to say
its good
magnetisation/form
not their contents
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
so at the end
fw
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
lol
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
thank you
abrar?
propensity within someone
"Put a blanket."
division of reality is straying away from it