but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

much more tactility

or never left

which magnetises chains of pins

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

have you read

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

magnetisation/form

send your tumblr

whats your name?

as in

and the fake qualifier

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

lol yea

like first name

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i have read not even 1 book

so the method has to be autonomous

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

and the fake qualifier

all that is to say

we can only engage in such a way

i really havent

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

no i haven't really read anything

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

December 2025

not so on: yvf(wthw)

...