think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
plato
all that is to say
we can only engage in such a way
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
lol
its good
magnetisation/form
like first name
god being the centre magnet
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so at the end
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
propensity within someone
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
was it worth it
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
abrar?
idk
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
...
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
fw
its good
i really havent
...