FOUNDING DOCUMENT

i have read not even 1 book

idk

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

that looks like my instagram account

its performative

all that is to say

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

whats your name?

which magnetises chains of pins

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

have you read

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

isaac

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

much more tactility

you cannot feed someone truth

its good

magnetisation/form

like magnets

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

so the method has to be autonomous

magnetises a pin

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i understand

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

we can only engage in such a way

a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext