think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
i have read not even 1 book
division of reality is straying away from it
so an active mazelike process
lol
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
lol yea
is everyoneback on tumblr now
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
its performative
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
barren land
or never left
magnetisation/form
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46