something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.

was it worth it

all that is to say

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

feel you

idk

ahnaf abrar

much more tactility

so an active mazelike process

so at the end

bro i read nothing in my life

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

have you read

is this you as well

send link

It Will Get Lighter

so the method has to be autonomous

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

and the fake qualifier

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

sorry i am texting like a slav

we can only engage in such a way

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.