its good
Thank you, Jack
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
so the method has to be autonomous
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
fw
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
have you read
its performative
i have read not even 1 book
plato
magnetises a pin
you cannot feed someone truth
...
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
hello reader,
god being the centre magnet
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
I am below everything.
we want to live the knowledge too live the content