Tue, 02 Dec 2025 11:29:50

Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

not their contents

Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:11:24

Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:31:03

i want to do that too

i dont understand magnetisation

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

i really havent

have you read

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

its good

yeah

no i haven't really read anything

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

division of reality is straying away from it

something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.