think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i have read not even 1 book
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
abrar?
all that is to say
was it worth it
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
and the fake qualifier
send link
wait what is that
bro i read nothing in my life
i really havent
Thank you, Jack
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
is this you as well
...
not so on: yvf(wthw)
i understand
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
much more tactility
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17
But seriously, thank you, Jack
Better Lift
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.