no like which do people call me
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
idk
much more tactility
magnetisation/form
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
fw
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
you cannot feed someone truth
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
all that is to say
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
yeah
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
Tue, 02 Dec 2025 11:29:50
...
i am quite illiterate on producing technology
Thank you, Jack
the textwall is as much for me as it is for you
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it