bro i read nothing in my life

we can only engage in such a way

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

whats your name?

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

as in

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

division of reality is straying away from it

propensity within someone

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i have read not even 1 book

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so at the end

what do you think my name is

or never left

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

so the method has to be autonomous

magnetises a pin

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

god being the centre magnet

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

is this you as well

i love it here