we can only engage in such a way

was it worth it

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

yeah

i was tempted to lie about my name

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

whats your name?

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

ion

have you read

magnetises a pin

ahnaf abrar

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

no like which do people call me

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

is this you as well

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

magnetisation/form

i want to do that too

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

isaac newton

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

plato

currently

no longer writing in the third person

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt