this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

as in

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

you cannot feed someone truth

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its good

ion

yeah

we can only engage in such a way

so the method has to be autonomous

division of reality is straying away from it

autonomy of learning

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

and the fake qualifier

i dont understand magnetisation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

was it worth it

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation


hello reader,

is this you as well

i was tempted to lie about my name

much more tactility

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

your feed looks like my tumblr

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

Lift Analysis

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class