this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
as in
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
you cannot feed someone truth
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
its good
ion
yeah
we can only engage in such a way
so the method has to be autonomous
division of reality is straying away from it
autonomy of learning
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i dont understand magnetisation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
was it worth it
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
hello reader,
is this you as well
i was tempted to lie about my name
much more tactility
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
your feed looks like my tumblr
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class