there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i really havent

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

isaac newton

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

what do you mean

was it worth it

ion

i dont understand magnetisation

not their contents

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it


It Will Get Lighter

you cannot feed someone truth

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

Style

its good

the site i am dreaming

There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.

IWGD

is this you as well

this will be about a slug