ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
all that is to say
magnetises a pin
autonomy of learning
is this you as well
wait what is that
no like which do people call me
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
division of reality is straying away from it
and the fake qualifier
abrar?
we can only engage in such a way
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
...
its good short few pages
hello reader,