it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

god being the centre magnet

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

fw

propensity within someone

2 (actually index). two is company

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so an active mazelike process

not their contents


think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

that looks like my instagram account

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

as in

so at the end

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

December 2025

magnetisation/form

i really havent

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

It Will Get Lighter

so the method has to be autonomous

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

you cannot feed someone truth

but i respect your search

Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl