i love it here

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

so at the end

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

not their contents

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

yeah

its performative

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

as in

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i want to do that too

all that is to say

autonomy of learning

magnetisation/form

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

so an active mazelike process

you cannot feed someone truth

and the fake qualifier

lol

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

bro i read nothing in my life

was it worth it

not so on: yvf(wthw)

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

much more tactility

2 (actually index). two is company

i have read not even 1 book