its good

so the method has to be autonomous

not their contents

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i was tempted to lie about my name

is this you as well

what do you mean

ahnaf abrar

i dont understand magnetisation

as in

division of reality is straying away from it

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

yeah

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

all that is to say

i want to do that too

Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:

what do you think my name is

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

It's

dusk

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

Lift Analysis

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.