i dont understand magnetisation

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

sorry i am texting like a slav

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

hello reader,

its performative

i want to do that too

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

we can only engage in such a way

like first name

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

no like which do people call me

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

its good

magnetises a pin

your feed looks like my tumblr

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

thank you

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

as in

which magnetises chains of pins

so at the end

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

so an active mazelike process

i really havent

I've found the girl, or she's found me, and we're smoking a cigarette while we watch the silhouettes of the French Raj and his fireworks bearer down on the bank.

no i haven't really read anything

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

what do you think my name is

1

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying