...
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so the method has to be autonomous
all that is to say
propensity within someone
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
which magnetises chains of pins
its good short few pages
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
is this you as well
not their contents
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
i love it here
we need to be deconstructing our identities
no i haven't really read anything
like first name
ion
i really havent
so an active mazelike process
that looks like my instagram account
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
and the fake qualifier
December 2025
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
as in
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
bro i read nothing in my life