i am quite illiterate on producing technology
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
its performative
really i want the internet
propensity within someone
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
you cannot feed someone truth
not their contents
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so at the end
division of reality is straying away from it
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
so the method has to be autonomous
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
all that is to say
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
as in
kind of mythopoesis
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
we can only engage in such a way
but i respect your search
so an active mazelike process
There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.
Thank you, Jack
Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?