there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

magnetisation/form

its good

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

plato

whats your name?

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

its performative

what do you mean

propensity within someone

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i dont understand magnetisation

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

much more tactility

Can I see

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

Imprint, memory, impact, representation, impression

Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:31:03

It's

dusk

in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.
It bites my wrist but there is only a dull ache.
I feel that it wants to say sorry but can't. I die.

fw

its good short few pages

so an active mazelike process

its good

isaac

i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue

so the method has to be autonomous

currently

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

13, H, grate

we want to live the knowledge too live the content