I am below everything.

idk

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

propensity within someone

magnetisation/form

you cannot feed someone truth

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

all that is to say

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

division of reality is straying away from it

so an active mazelike process

not their contents

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

much more tactility

have you read

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

yeah

no i haven't really read anything

its good short few pages

its performative

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

thank you

lol yea

Can I see

i dont understand magnetisation