the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

all that is to say

we can only engage in such a way

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

propensity within someone

bro i read nothing in my life

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

lol yea

that looks like my instagram account

plato

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

isaac newton

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

like first name

thank you

yeah

division of reality is straying away from it

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

is this you as well

whats your name?

abrar?

i want to do that too

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

She closes the window. I wasn't paying attention anyway, I'm getting cold, and the birds are nowhere to be seen. I go inside.

I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?

it is hopeful