think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

not their contents

you cannot feed someone truth

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

autonomy of learning

as in

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

ahnaf abrar

sorry i am texting like a slav

its good

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

propensity within someone

i really havent

plato

we need to be deconstructing our identities

magnetisation/form

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

December 2025

plato

2 (actually index). two is company

bro i read nothing in my life

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i want to do that too

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i have read not even 1 book

...

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation