lol

isaac newton

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

you cannot feed someone truth

its performative

not their contents

i have read not even 1 book

fw

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

is everyoneback on tumblr now

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

magnetisation/form

so the method has to be autonomous

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

send your tumblr

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

your feed looks like my tumblr

...

yeah

It's

dusk

Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

autonomy of learning

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

IWGD

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls