somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

not their contents

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

ion

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

all that is to say

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

much more tactility

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

we can only engage in such a way

so an active mazelike process

its performative

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

you cannot feed someone truth

so the method has to be autonomous

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

lol yea

yes