bro i read nothing in my life
so the method has to be autonomous
what do you mean
feel you
idk
we can only engage in such a way
have you read
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
its good short few pages
as in
its performative
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
not their contents
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
bro i read nothing in my life
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
magnetisation/form
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
i really havent
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
that looks like my instagram account
the site i am dreaming
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations: