mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i love it here

i really havent

like first name

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

ahnaf abrar

which magnetises chains of pins

was it worth it

like magnets

and the fake qualifier

ion

isaac

sorry i am texting like a slav

its good

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

isaac newton

as in

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

is this you as well

abrar?

was it worth it

December 2025

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

plato

its good

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

not so on: yvf(wthw)

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

lol