After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

fw

we can only engage in such a way

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

much more tactility

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

yeah

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

its good

so the method has to be autonomous

like first name

your feed looks like my tumblr

we need to be deconstructing our identities

that looks like my instagram account

yes

13, H, grate

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

isaac

i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.