propensity within someone

as in

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i have read not even 1 book

so at the end

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

you cannot feed someone truth

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

idk

not their contents

IWGD

It Will Get Lighter

FOUNDING DOCUMENT

a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.

I created this site

autonomy of learning

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

Rain, starting

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13