i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
god being the centre magnet
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
and the fake qualifier
which magnetises chains of pins
no i haven't really read anything
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
plato
like first name
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine
whats your name?
division of reality is straying away from it
kind of mythopoesis
so the method has to be autonomous
i understand
as in
we can only engage in such a way
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.