like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

so the method has to be autonomous

lol

autonomy of learning

we can only engage in such a way

propensity within someone

so an active mazelike process

magnetises a pin

Thank you, Jack

idk

no like which do people call me

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

which magnetises chains of pins

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation