this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
much more tactility
so the method has to be autonomous
no like which do people call me
i was tempted to lie about my name
we need to be deconstructing our identities
was it worth it
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i understand
bro i read nothing in my life
idk
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
so at the end
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
autonomy of learning
i dont understand magnetisation
you cannot feed someone truth
but really the thing should be autonomous
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i want to do that too
have you read
kind of mythopoesis
i really havent
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying