that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

yeah

as in

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

much more tactility

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

god being the centre magnet

and the fake qualifier

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so an active mazelike process

whats your name?

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

...

Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15

like first name

is this you as well

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

the site i am dreaming