have you read

so the method has to be autonomous

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

thank you

all that is to say

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

isaac

its good

i dont understand magnetisation

as in

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i understand

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

not their contents

its good

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

i want to do that too

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

ion

you cannot feed someone truth

autonomy of learning

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

propensity within someone

plato

which magnetises chains of pins

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

...

i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue

Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03